Showing posts with label john cornyn. Show all posts
Showing posts with label john cornyn. Show all posts

Sunday, June 06, 2010

Kerry and Cornyn on This Week

On This Week, John Kerry set John Cornyn straight. Cornyn and the republicans have proved themselves useless in helping to solve any problem this nation faces. And there are many. And many of them have been caused by republican policies, which is the irony of it all. I've never seen a group of people so adamant in doing absolutely nothing. The republicans sole motivation is politics.
We need energy legislation and we need it now. We need to have a permanent ban on offshore oil drilling, and to hold us over until we ramp up alternative energies, the Obama administration needs to ask Americans to conserve. The last part was just a fantasy request. Sacrifice isn't part of the American psyche.
Frankly, Cornyn sounded like an imbecile:
TAPPER: This week, President Obama used the gusher in the Gulf to push the Senate to move on a comprehensive energy bill which Democratic Senator John Kerry introduced earlier this year. He joins us from Concord, New Hampshire now. Also joining us this morning, Republican Senator John Cornyn, chair of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, which helps elect Republicans to the Senate.

Senator Cornyn is in Austin, Texas this morning. Senator Kerry, Senator Cornyn, thanks for joining us.

KERRY: Thank you. Glad to be with you.

TAPPER: Senator Kerry, starting with you. Do you think the Obama administration has been too cozy or too trusting with BP?

KERRY: No, I think they are holding BP's feet to the fire, but obviously this has been, as you just heard Admiral Allen say, it's continued to dissipate, it continues to provide challenges. I think they've got an extraordinary number of workers, 17,500 National Guard, over 20,000 workers, almost 2,000 vessels. It's growing. They are growing to meet the demand. And I am convinced you're going to see the Congress of the United States and the administration together hold BP and the drilling process accountable.

TAPPER: Senator Cornyn, how would you rate BP's response? Should its CEO, Tony Hayward, stay or should he go?

CORNYN: Well, BP's response has been lousy. They are the ones that started this problem, and unfortunately, Jake, here we are 48 days into it, and I'm glad to hear Admiral Allen saying we've accumulated the human and physical assets we need to deal with this problem, but it sure has taken a long time. And I think a lot of the confusion has been because no one has really known who's in charge. Is it the president of the United States? Is it the CEO of British Petroleum? Who is it? Is it Admiral Allen? So I think really, we need the president to step up and assert himself and to say, let's cut through the red tape, let's cut through the chain of command, and let's get the assets where they need to be in order to protect the beaches and the people of that important region.

TAPPER: Senator Kerry, you were smiling during that. You want to respond?

KERRY: Well, it's sort of fashionable (inaudible) right now to try to blame the Obama administration for this disaster, which occurred because of a drilling problem that occurred with BP and Transoceanic (sic) and so forth. From day one, from the first moment, from within hours of this happening, President Obama was notified. The next day, he held the principals meeting in the White House. He's been down there three times. Every major person in the administration has been there. You have the best minds in the country being brought to bear on this. But everybody understands, the government of the United States doesn't do the drilling. The government of the United States doesn't have the technology. They have been racing to try to make up for BP's mistakes and for the absence here of a sufficient level of emergency.

Frankly, we had eight years, as many of us remember, of secret oil industry meetings where they wrote the oil laws, where there was an incestuous relationship with the MMS, and everybody understands this relationship has to change.

I think it is changing now.

Here's what's important. Not to be throwing the blame around, but to put America on the course to true energy independence and self-reliance and to begin to wean ourselves from our addiction to oil. And the Congress has staring it in the face an opportunity to catch up to the rest of the world. China, India, Germany, Japan, other countries are using American discovered technologies in solar and wind, and they're rushing them to the marketplace. The United States is losing a major economic transformational moment. Until we begin to do something -- you know, since 9/11, we now actually import more oil than we did before 9/11. It's insulting to common sense.

And what we need to do is pass an energy comprehensive policy that prices carbon and begins to move America to the future so we can get into the marketplace. We'll have less pollution, better health, better national security, better competitiveness, increased ability to provide our own national energy policy, and we will create millions of jobs. Read the whole Transcript
On the roundtable portion of the show, Tapper stacked the table with the left of the left, Huffington and the Daily Kos guy, and the right of the right, George Will and Liz Cheney. With such extremes represented at the table, the conversation was dull. Obama got slammed all around table.

Sunday, May 23, 2010

Cornyn: Rand Paul is Just a Citizen Who Made a Mistake

Meet the Press's David Gregory starts off hammering Rand Paul for backing out of the show at the last minute.
Paul would've been wiser to just show up. I'm sure the republicans are giving him the Sarah Palin shut down. He's not nearly as ignorant as Palin, but his views are too extreme for normal people and he needs to learn how to temper his speech.
John Cornyn says Rand Paul is just a citizen who ran for office and isn't as polished.
He explains libertarian beliefs, saying that libertarians believe in smaller government.
Yeah, way smaller government. They advocate getting rid of entire agencies, such as the EPA and OSHA. I wonder if Paul is going to let republicans make him over or will he take the Sarah Palin route, quit and go rogue. I don't know why he would want to be a Senator. For someone who despises government, the Senate doesn't seem like the right place to be.
Cornyn is right when he says people are looking for candidates with integrity. We're looking all right, but there's not a lot of good choices coming from the republicans or the democrats.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy


Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy


Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Sunday, October 25, 2009

Cornyn Unwittingly Makes the Case for Obama's Rethinking of Afghanistan

If Obama said we should be kind to our neighbor, republicans would say... now wait a minute, that's probably not a good idea.

On Meet the Press Jon Cornyn ends up making the case for why Obama is reconsidering strategy in Afghanistan. David Gregory asks him pointedly: Did Cheney provide enough troops to win in Afghanistan? Then Cornyn goes on to say it's not just troops, it's strategy. Bingo. Here's the clip:
The whole episode:

Transcript

Sunday, September 13, 2009

Durbin and Dean: Public Option is Still on the Table

Contrary to what republican Olympia Snowe said this morning, Dick Durbin and Howard Dean say the public option or something like the public option is still on the table. Howard dean said regulating insurance companies like utilities would do the trick. John Cornyn says something but he's irrelevant:
Dean says it doesn't matter to the American people how healthcare is passed:

Saturday, September 12, 2009

Election Losers Lashing Out Arrive by Bus Loads in DC

Tea Party slugs arrive in buses yelling "You work for us." No, Obama works for America, Tea Partiers, and even though you are the crankiest, most obnoxious, irrational, rudest and most violent, you are only a small, teeny tiny, itty bitty sliver of America.

I'll let this video speak for itself.

Next up, we have John Cornyn of Secession-Me Texas who says Obama isn't listening to republicans. Shut up. We have the blue dogs for rational conservative input. At the end, where Cornyn says "May God continue to bless the United States of America," it sounds like one of those ongoing digs at Obama, meant to discredit and delegitimize Obama and the office of the presidency. As if God needs to continue to bless America because Obama is president. That is how these people think:

Rush Limbaugh says Obama needs to resign. Ha! Shut your pie hole Rush. I'd love a few minutes with this guy so that I could figure out what his thing was. Does he really believe all the crap that falls out of his mouth or is much of it theater?

Thursday, July 16, 2009

Coburn Challenges Sotomayor on Guns

Guns, guns, guns. What's up with these guys and their guns? If they defended things like healthcare and education like they defended guns, we'd live in a better society. Sotomayor shows she is incredibly wise and turns the question around on Coburn:

Franken asks: why do you want to be Supreme Court justice? Sotomayor tells, through a story, how precious law and public service are to her. It's actually quite touching. I'm really enjoying these hearings because it shows who our Congress people are and what they care about.

Sen. Cornyn tries to explain why republicans keep asking the same question over and over:

See Lindsey Graham's concluding remarks here.

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Sotomayor Answers Firefighter Case

It seems to me that a week's worth of hearings is a colossal waste of time and taxpayer money. I understand the need to question nominees, but Sotomayor keeps getting the same question over and over and most of the questioning seems to be for show. They could get this done in 2 days max and move on to priorities, such as healthcare. But we're learning that Sotomayor is smart, capable, even tempered and unflappable. She's going to make a great justice.

Sotomayor gets a question on whether people have the right to defend themselves in their home:

More on "wise Latina:" "My words failed. They didn't work," Sotomayor said. But the message of the speech was the same as what Samuel Alito tried to convey:

Wednesday, July 08, 2009

Republicans Scared of Healthcare Reform

On healthcare, democrats just need to keep their head down and get the job done. Mitch McConnell says the democrats own the government.

Saturday, May 30, 2009

Obama's Walkback a Win For Newt and Limbaugh?

John Dickerson at Slate seems to think that Rush and Newt won the battle:
After calling some people in the administration, I've come to this conclusion: It doesn't matter that Sotomayor may still believe in better. The 32 words make sense in the context of the speech and the particular passage about sex and race discrimination cases, but we're in a political moment and there's no time for context. The full idea of her speech was not conveyed by those 32 words, and rather than have a long debate down in the weeds, the White House wants us all to have a nice weekend.
The walkback is a small victory for Newt Gingrich and Rush Limbaugh, who called Sotomayor a racist for her comments. These 32 words were not a surprise to the White House. If they'd anticipated a bad reaction, they would have issued today's walkback three days earlier. This doesn't mean that Sotomayor's nomination is in trouble. (Republican Sen. John Cornyn, who sits on the Senate judiciary committee, rebuked Gingrich today for his remark.) But the White House hedge means that the bomb throwers were effective on some level. Whether they succeed in snuffing out this debate depends on what Sotomayor says in her hearing. Has she given up on the idea that her experiences would make her a better jurist than a white male judge, more often than not, in sex and race discrimination cases? She'll have plenty of time to choose her words carefully.
But I don't believe that's the case at all, though I'm sure Rush and Newt have already added feathers to their cap. 

I think Obama was concerned that the level of conversation degenerated so much that he made a strategic move to effectively end that conversation so that we could all move on to another conversation. It was getting really ugly. Even republicans were calling on Newt and Rush to stop. Rational people know that Newt and Rush are off the deep end. They merely dragged their party deeper in the mud. 

Obama gave them a bone for the soundbite in question but not for Sotomayor in context. Newt and Rush really lost because they no longer have any ammunition. Who cares if they pat each other on the back. If we all stopped responding to Rush and Newt, they'd simply go away. But they know how to raise everyone's hackles and they're experts in using the media. 

Rational people know exactly what Sotomayor meant. Now, we'll get to hear about the stuff we should be hearing about, Sotomayor's cases and her professional life.

Friday, May 29, 2009

Some Republicans Getting Sick of Rush, Newt

Reporting from Washington -- While prominent conservative activists are hurling epithets at President Obama's Supreme Court nominee, more and more Republicans are telling them to chill out.

Senior senators and GOP strategists are trying to steer the debate over Sonia Sotomayor away from the apocalyptic battle cries of conservative icons Newt Gingrich and Rush Limbaugh in favor of a more measured conversation about the legal philosophy and qualifications of the first Latino to be nominated to the court.

"I think it's terrible," Sen. John Cornyn (R- Texas), said in a radio interview aired today, condemning Gingrich and Limbaugh for calling Sotomayor a racist. "This is not the kind of tone that any of us want to set when it comes to performing our constitutional responsibilities of advise and consent." Read more at LAT
Even Michael Steele, in his very unique way, says some conservatives need to back off:
Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele suggested Friday that Republicans hold off on "slammin' and rammin'" Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor and instead recognize the "historic aspect" of her nomination.

While guest hosting the Bill Bennett radio show on Friday morning, Steele said he was "excited" to see a Hispanic woman in this position. CNN
Jeff Sessions says he's uneasy:
Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), the top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said today he was "uneasy" over allegations by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and talk-show host Rush Limbaugh that Sotomayor is racist. Sessions, who lost a 1986 bid for a federal judgeship amid concerns over his own racial sensitivity, said Republicans should focus on Sotomayor's legal record to try to divine what sort of a Supreme Court justice she would make.

"I'm uneasy," Sessions said in a 30-minute interview in his office in the Russell Senate Office Building. "I don't think that's good rhetoric. The question is, has the judge gone too far or not, given the established law of the land?" WaPo