Showing posts with label tea party movement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tea party movement. Show all posts

Thursday, September 16, 2010

Tea Party Factions Debate Fiscal and Social

NPR offers two tea party perspectives (listen below) but if you listen closely, they're very much aligned. They've always been aligned, yet the media have been slow to discover that.
The fiscal faction is socially conservative (no different than many republicans), but doesn't focus on social issues, even though they pray before meetings are against abortion, believe in a creator and are against gay marriage.
The other faction also is fiscally conservative but they say you can't have good government without a focus on "social values," which it defines as: "resisting the homosexual agenda," "belief in a creator" and the "right to life."
I'm betting you wouldn't find a single tea partier opposed to the social issues spelled out in that manner. In reality, the tea party people are socially conservative. Social issues are just on the back burner right now, despite any protest otherwise. In the tea party, "social values" are understood and are not beliefs that need to be spoken.
Those who are strictly fiscally conservative, without being mired in social issues, are libertarians. Frankly, it would be interesting to see a tea party types actually try to lead when faced with the reality of governing. Would they melt? Fall apart? Buck up? Hillary Clinton (watch):
Getting elected will bring candidates propelled by the tea party “down to earth,” Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said in an interview on Thursday.

"Well, I've seen a lot of people run for office and say a lot of things, and then when they have the burden of holding office and the responsibility that goes with it," Clinton said, "I've seen them become very sobered, very quickly, about the challenges we face domestically and internationally.” Politico

Thursday, April 16, 2009

Left Tries But Can't Deny Tea Parties

I'm not sure if the tea parties are full of people truly mad about taxes (even though we all just got tax breaks and record deficits were created under Bush) or they're mostly just haters of Obama and what they perceive as socialist government.
Either way, it's wrong to dismiss the tea parties as James Wolcott does in this video. Nancy Pelosi called it AstroTurf, instead of grassroots.
Dismissing it makes it stronger.
They may be small and they may be supported by big outfits such as FreedomWorks and Fox "News," but there's no doubt there's a strong minority of mad people.
The tea party movement could be a way for the republicans to sort themselves out, to figure out who's going to lead the party and how they're going to move forward.
Do the republican leaders glom on to tea parties or does a strong leader emerge to take the GOP in a progressive and positive direction? And did I just dismiss the tea party movement?

Global warming is a tax scam created by the liberals: