Showing posts with label sonia sotomayor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sonia sotomayor. Show all posts
Sunday, October 03, 2010
Thursday, January 21, 2010
Obama's Statement on SCOTUS Decision
With its ruling today, the Supreme Court has given a green light to a new stampede of special interest money in our politics. It is a major victory for big oil, Wall Street banks, health insurance companies and the other powerful interests that marshal their power every day in Washington to drown out the voices of everyday Americans. This ruling gives the special interests and their lobbyists even more power in Washington--while undermining the influence of average Americans who make small contributions to support their preferred candidates. That's why I am instructing my Administration to get to work immediately with Congress on this issue. We are going to talk with bipartisan Congressional leaders to develop a forceful response to this decision. The public interest requires nothing less.Sen. Olympia Snowe has also come out against the ruling, which will generally be a good thing for republican candidates, according to NPR:
In his dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens lamented the decision and called the majority "profoundly misguided." He said, "The court’s ruling threatens to undermine the integrity of elected institutions around the nation." Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor joined Stevens' dissent, parts of which he read aloud in the courtroom. NPR
Labels:
barack obama,
campaign finance,
sonia sotomayor,
supreme court
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
Sotomayor Answers Firefighter Case
It seems to me that a week's worth of hearings is a colossal waste of time and taxpayer money. I understand the need to question nominees, but Sotomayor keeps getting the same question over and over and most of the questioning seems to be for show. They could get this done in 2 days max and move on to priorities, such as healthcare. But we're learning that Sotomayor is smart, capable, even tempered and unflappable. She's going to make a great justice.
Sotomayor gets a question on whether people have the right to defend themselves in their home:
More on "wise Latina:" "My words failed. They didn't work," Sotomayor said. But the message of the speech was the same as what Samuel Alito tried to convey:
Sotomayor gets a question on whether people have the right to defend themselves in their home:
More on "wise Latina:" "My words failed. They didn't work," Sotomayor said. But the message of the speech was the same as what Samuel Alito tried to convey:
Wednesday, June 03, 2009
Rush Turns Fuzzball for Sotomayor
Rush Limbaugh, who refers to himself as a fuzzball, manages to eke out some decent words for Sonia Sotomayor today. I wonder how his audience is taking this. It seems head spinning.
Newt Apologizes For Calling Sotomayor Racist
It's not a hearty apology, and he chooses to do it at an Obama hate site, but it's a recognition of foolishness nonetheless. It's good to know Newt Gingrich has a little sense.
But fear not, with Newt's apology out of the way, he gets back to what he really meant to say:
My initial reaction was strong and direct -- perhaps too strong and too direct. The sentiment struck me as racist and I said so. Since then, some who want to have an open and honest consideration of Judge Sotomayor’s fitness to serve on the nation’s highest court have been critical of my word choice.Obama didn't admit that her words were unacceptable. Obama said that the sentence taken out of context could've been worded better.
With these critics who want to have an honest conversation, I agree. The word “racist” should not have been applied to Judge Sotomayor as a person, even if her words themselves are unacceptable (a fact which both President Obama and his Press Secretary, Robert Gibbs, have since admitted).
But fear not, with Newt's apology out of the way, he gets back to what he really meant to say:
So it is to her words -- the ones quoted above and others -- to which we should turn, for they show that the issue here is not racial identity politics. Sotomayor’s words reveal a betrayal of a fundamental principle of the American system -- that everyone is equal before the law.You see Newt, there is no such thing as "blind justice." That's the ideal. But the hope for blind justice only improves when there is a more diverse group of judges making decisions. That's tough for a party that's largely white to understand.
The Central Question: Is American Justice No Longer Blindfolded? HE
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)