As an average citizen, this kind of thing really ticks me off. There ought to be a way to fire Congress people prior to their terms being up:
Sen. Kit Bond (R-Mo.) on Sunday refused to apologize per the White House's request for saying that they leaked sensitive intelligence about the Christmas Day bomber.
Bond said that the White House owes an apology for putting the investigation of the attempted terror attack in jeopardy.
White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs this week called on Bond to apologize "to the law enforcement community and those that work in this building" for alleging the White House had leaked classified information about its Flight 253 investigation.
None of that information about Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab's recent cooperation with investigators was classified, Gibbs assured reporters during Thursday's press briefing.
"I think anybody that was involved in knowing in the Senate Intelligence Committee what was briefed and what was reported would know that that wasn't violated," Gibbs said.
White House counterterrorism chief John Brennan makes it clear that politicians are interfering with national security and he appears pretty perturbed about that. He says politicians don't know the facts and are spreading untruths to the press. Brennan said republicans were briefed on the underwear bomber on Christmas night. That night Brennan called to Pete Hoekstra, Mitch McConnell, Kit Bond and John Boehner. NONE OF THEM RAISED ANY CONCERNS AT THAT POINT, Brennan said. Brennan says politicians are using national security, our lives, as a political football. Despicable.
And now they care? Give us a break. Anybody would know this hurry-up ploy by republicans is a farce. If it wasn't for Obama, Afghanistan wouldn't even be on the tips of people's tongues. Before Obama can decide on troop numbers, he has to decide on the new strategy, which will dictate troop numbers. Robert Gates said on Sunday that the wrong strategy would be deadly. Kit Bond clearly hasn't a clue what he's talking about. Obama is the Commander in Chief. He's the one with the thousand foot view. He's the one who considers all of the consequences of our actions in Afghanistan. He makes the decision--not Gen. McChrystal.
Republicans accuse Obama of closing Guantanamo to keep a campaign promise. Hello Kit Bond. It's called setting a goal. He promised to close Gitmo, that was the goal. Now we'll come up with objectives to meet that goal. Looks like the republicans have taken advice from Cheney, who turned loose 100s of Gitmo detainees. The Obama administration will do it the right way or they won't do it at all. As if Obama would risk the country's safety. Republicans need to get a life. The trouble with this kind of talk--Obama's threatening the safety of our country--is that many people in their party are unstable. It's just wrong to fear monger. But for them, fear mongering is an outright strategy.
In addition to being a big surprise, many seem to think Panetta is not up on his spycraft, including Senator Dianne Feinstein, who will chair the Senate Intelligence Committee. Huh? is their reaction. Others like the shift from waterboarding to intelligence. A former CIA officer, Robert Baer, says at least Obama knows the CIA's problems.
Leon Panetta may not have an intelligence background, but his appointment as CIA director shows that Barack Obama understands the CIA's problems.
Maybe the long-troubled CIA, which seems to lack leadership, will actually get an intelligence boost.
Houston Chronicle: WASHINGTON — President-elect Barack Obama's decision to fill the nation's top intelligence jobs with two men short on direct experience in intelligence gathering surprised the spy community and signaled the Democrat's intention for a clean break from Bush administration policies. Former Clinton White House chief of staff Leon Panetta, an eight-term congressional veteran and administrative expert, is being tapped to head the CIA. Retired Adm. Dennis Blair is Obama's choice to be director of national intelligence, a selection expected for weeks, according to two Democrats who spoke on condition of anonymity because Obama has not officially announced the choices. Obama is sending an unequivocal message that controversial administration policies approving harsh interrogations, waterboarding and extraordinary renditions — the secret transfer of prisoners to other governments with a history of torture — and warrantless wiretapping are over, said several officials. Earlier pick withdrew The search for Obama's new CIA chief had been stalled since November, when John Brennan, Obama's transition intelligence adviser, abruptly withdrew his name from consideration. And despite an internal list of former and current CIA officials who had impressive administrative credentials, all either worked in intelligence during the Bush administration's development of controversial policies on interrogation and torture or earlier, during the months leading up to the Sept. 11 terror attacks. Neither Panetta nor Blair are tainted by associations with Bush administration policies, in large part because they both come from outside the intelligence world. Blair was posted at the CIA for about a year.
A later e-mail: 'Senator Kit Bond, Vice Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, ... made the following comments on President-elect Obama's nomination of Leon Panetta as the next Director of the Central Intelligence Agency: 'Job number one at the CIA is to track down and stop terrorists. In a post-9-11 world, intelligence experience would seem to be a prerequisite for the job of CIA Director.'
CIA chief Porter Goss abruptly and unexpectedly resigned his post yesterday, apparently pushed out by intelligence czar John Negroponte after less than two years leading an agency dogged by morale problems.
Senior administration officials told reporters following videotaped statements by Goss and George W. Bush that Negroponte, who was given the nation's top intelligence post by the U.S. president, had recently raised the prospect of the departure of the former Florida congressman.
Here is what Bush said of Goss when he appointed him in 2004:
"He knows the CIA inside and out," Bush said of Goss, who was chairman of the House Intelligence Committee and served as a clandestine CIA officer in the 1960s in Central America and Western Europe. "He's the right man to lead this important agency at this critical moment in our nation's history."
Which proves that knowing the CIA inside and out doesn't necessarily make a good CIA head. Politico says Obama will be pushing Panetta's plusses:
THE CASE TEAM OBAMA WILL BE MAKING FOR PANETTA:
*Good manager -- recognized across the board for his management ability
*Foreign policy experience -- handled foreign policy as White House chief of staff, Bosnia war, etc...
*Intelligence -- as head of OMB, handled intelligence budget and other sensitive matters
*Bipartisanship -- good bipartisan support in Congress
--And a former colleague says don't forget: Calm and collected.
"I think he's going to be fine," senior adviser David Axelrod said. Of concerns that Panetta might not have enough experience with the CIA's culture, Axelrod said Panetta "will do well. He's tough and smart." Evan Bayh is with Feinstein. They like Steve Kappes, deputy chief of CIA.
