Gibbs On Roberston's Haiti Remarks

If you missed Pat Robertson's dimwittedness, you can watch that here. I didn't catch Rush Limbaugh's comments yesterday. I try not to listen to too much negativity in one day, and frankly, I just didn't have the patience yesterday to listen to Fuzzball spew hate over Haiti.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs called the Rev. Pat Robertson's comments that Haitians brought the earthquake tragedy on themselves "utterly stupid" and said it is "sad" for someone as wealthy as talk radio host Rush Limbaugh to urge people not to contribute to Haiti relief efforts.

"I don't know how anybody could sit where he does, having enjoyed the success that he has, and not feel some measure of sorrow for what has happened in Haiti," Gibbs said when asked about Limbaugh's remarks Thursday. "To use the power of your pulpit to try to convince those not to help their brothers and sisters is sad."

Gibbs also said he believes most people will ignore Robertson, who said Wednesday that a 7.0 magnatude earthquake devastated Haiti, a nation that practices voodoo along with Christianity, because Haitians "made a pact with the devil." Politico

Haitian Ambassador Sets Robertson Straight

Pat Robertson made these ludicrous comments today. I would guess that Robertson is so doubtful about the existence of god that he has to constantly try and prove it. Haitian ambassador Raymond Joseph offers a little history lesson:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Pat Robertson Blames Haitian Earthquake on Pact With Devil

As Joe Scarborough aggressively defends Pat Robertson's efforts to help Haiti, Robertson is defeating his own cause by blaming the earthquake on a Haitian pact with the devil. The words Robertson's speaks have consequences. Saying ridiculous things doesn't help the people of Haiti. Robertson is sitting in judgement, influencing a whole population of people who know no better. That's why many people are turned off by religion.

Geography, not the devil, is the cause of natural disasters in Haiti:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Pat Robertson Pleased With Obama

This hard-edge evangelical also had misgivings about McCain. Robertson endorsed Rudy, so now you know where his mind is at. Frankly, I'm tired of all these egomaniacal preachers. They're constantly saying and doing stupid things that drive people apart. From Think Progress:

After giving Bush a C- for his presidency, Robertson said he’s “remarkably pleased with Obama.” Despite having “grave misgivings about him” earlier, Robertson said he now lauds Obama for picking a “middle-of-the road Cabinet.” “I’m very pleased so far,” he concluded.

Why the Media Approves McCain's Wacko Holy Men

gary kamiya is my new favorite writer. he also wrote this spectacular piece.

May. 20, 2008 John McCain has some seriously screwed-up holy men surrounding him. First, there's the Rev. John Hagee, a hate-monger and certifiable loon who believes that Hurricane Katrina was God's judgment on New Orleans for planning a gay parade, calls Catholicism a "false cult system" that conspired with Hitler to exterminate the Jews, and believes that America's divine duty is to destroy Iran. Then there's the Rev. Rod Parsley, who garnishes his bigoted theology by calling Islam "the greatest religious enemy of our civilization and the world" and saying that Muhammad was "a mouthpiece of a conspiracy of spiritual evil."

These psycho Christians make Robert Mitchum's sociopathic traveling preacher in "The Night of the Hunter" (the guy with "love" tattooed on one hand and "hate" on the other) look like St. Francis of Assisi. They are undiluted bigots who espouse beliefs just as twisted as those promulgated by the Rev. Louis Farrakhan -- and far more toxic and extreme than those held by Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

Yet, as many media critics have noted, no major-network interviewer is demanding that McCain denounce Hagee or Parsley, as Tim Russert infamously demanded again and again that Obama do of Farrakhan during a prime-time debate. No cable channel is ranting 24/7 about McCain's failure to disavow these extremist bigots, and speculating that his ties to Hagee and Parsley could cost him the election. Considering that McCain desperately needs Hagee and Parsley to deliver votes in key states like Ohio, this is no small matter.

It's true that neither Hagee nor Parsley was McCain's pastor and personal spiritual advisor, as Wright was for Obama. Obama's personal relationship with Wright raised more legitimate questions than were raised by McCain's actively seeking Hagee's endorsement. But especially during the second, more serious outburst of Wright-hysteria, after Wright went off the reservation at the National Press Club, it was obvious that the story had really shifted to Wright, not Obama. The brouhaha was a media ritual, in which Obama was required to sacrifice an unseemly political ally as a kind of campaign station of the cross. Obama had already given his now-famous speech about race in Philadelphia, and no one seriously believed that he shared Wright's views. In any case, even if Hagee and Parsley had been McCain's pastors, it's hard to imagine that the media would have attacked him as relentlessly as it has attacked Obama over Wright and Farrakhan.

The media's double standard is all about deference to perceived mainstream norms, and tiptoeing around the Christian right. Despite their cartoonish views, the media treats Hagee and Parsley as quasi-mainstream figures, which makes McCain's relationship with them non-newsworthy. The dirty little secret of mainstream American journalism is that it operates within invisible constraints that conform to some imagined Middle American consensus. The issue isn't that journalists share Hagee and Parsley's views so much as that they know that they are widely held, which makes them reluctant to acknowledge how truly outrageous they are. After years of nodding at the whacked-out likes of Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson, the media has, to borrow Daniel Patrick Moynihan's famous phrase, defined right-wing religious deviancy down. More or less "orthodox" Christian-right insanity, of the sort espoused by Hagee and Parsley, is familiar and normal, whereas black-church radicalism, with its ties to left-wing liberation theology, is not. In 2000, 45 percent of the population told Gallup they were either born-again or evangelical Christians.
The question of "newsworthiness" is one of the blind spots of conventional journalism. Since right-wing religious leaders have been endorsing conservative Republican candidates for decades (Moral Majority founder Jerry Falwell endorsed Ronald Reagan; Pat Robertson endorsed Rudy Giuliani; a small church in North Carolina kicked out members who voted for John Kerry), when another one does it, it's a dog-bites-man story. Mainstream editors and reporters pose as hard-bitten realists, but they are in fact reluctant to deviate from pack thinking. For the media to suddenly go after McCain on Hagee as hard as it has gone after Obama on Farrakhan and Wright would represent, in their eyes, a "controversial" rejection of the way things have always been done. read the rest