Monday, February 09, 2009

Stimulus is Going to Need People Oversight

When your cities begin receiving stimulus money, pay attention. Watch recovery.gov, where spending will be posted, and hold officials' feet to the fire. You know elected officials sometimes tend on the side of greed, sometimes incompetence, so make sure the money is going to where it's supposed to go. After all, the success of the stimulus, or not, affects the American people.
Obama said in his town hall in Elkhart that there will be a bipartisan board to watch over spending.
This story warns that oversight could be overburdened with the speedy spending that's called for:
The Obama administration's economic stimulus plan could end up wasting billions of dollars by attempting to spend money faster than an overburdened government acquisition system can manage and oversee it, according to documents and interviews with contracting specialists.

The $827 billion stimulus legislation under debate in Congress includes provisions aimed at ensuring oversight of the massive infusion of contracts, state grants and other measures. At the urging of the administration, those provisions call for transparency, bid competition, and new auditing resources and oversight boards.

But under the terms of the stimulus proposals, a depleted contracting workforce would be asked to spend more money more rapidly than ever before, while also improving competition and oversight. Auditors would be asked to track surges in spending on projects ranging from bridge construction and schools to research of "green" energy and the development of electronic health records -- a challenge made more difficult because many contracts would be awarded by state agencies.
Wouldn't it be nice if we could count on everyone to do the right thing?
Some supporters of the stimulus in Congress acknowledge the problems. Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) said she has no doubt the Obama administration desires accountability and transparency. To achieve that, she has proposed spending more on contracting workers, investigators and auditors -- including about $60 million to hire about 600 more acquisition workers.

"We have to beef up the acquisition personnel and the resources of the inspectors general or you cannot get to accountability," she said. "This bill isn't cheap, but it will cost us far more in the long run if we don't do this right.Read the rest at WaPo